End the U.S. blockade of Cuba
By
Cheryl LaBash
Published Oct 27, 2010 9:18 PM
The U.N. General Assembly on Oct. 26 voted 187 to 2 against the 48-year
economic blockade of Cuba. Only the U.S. and Israel voted for it. Palau,
Micronesia and the Marshall Islands abstained.
This international repudiation, the strongest yet, is the 19th consecutive
resolution condemning the U.S.’s criminal and cruel strangulation policy.
Yearly U.N. votes on the blockade began in 1992 with a 59 to 3 vote, with 71
abstentions. Last year’s vote was 187 to 3.
In 1960, the U.S. State Department recommended that since, “the majority
of Cubans support Castro ... [and] there is no effective political opposition
... the only foreseeable means of alienating internal support is through
disenchantment and disaffection based on economic dissatisfaction and hardship.
...
“[E]very possible means should be undertaken promptly to weaken the
economic life of Cuba. ... [S]uch a policy ... would call forth a line of
action which, while as adroit and inconspicuous as possible, makes the greatest
inroads in denying money and supplies to Cuba, to decrease monetary and real
wages, to bring about hunger, desperation and overthrow of government.”
(University of Wisconsin Digital Collection; Foreign Relations of U.S., p.
885)
The Cuban Ministry of Foreign Relations’ report for the 2010 U.N. debate
details the hardship and cost of the U.S.’s attempted strangulation of
Cuba’s economy and its people, and the widespread opposition to the
blockade inside the U.S.
The report outlines the blockade’s effect on Cuba when the U.S.
retaliates against other countries if they do business with Cuba. It says that
Cuba was notified that as of March 31, 2012, it won’t be able to use the
Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications system, which is
universally used for international payments, because U.S. software will update
that system. Cuba has been a member of SWIFT since 1990.
SWIFT was founded in 1973 by international banks to act as an “electronic
gatekeeper for funds crossing borders.” SWIFT is run by the National Bank
of Belgium and supervised by the U.S. Federal Reserve and many other
imperialist banks. (Wall Street Journal, Feb. 11)
In 2007 the SWIFT system was challenged for violating financial privacy when it
shared data with the U.S. government under the guise of the “war on
terrorism.” Such a U.S.-sponsored “data sharing” plan is
facing stiff opposition in the European Union’s parliament because of the
economic privacy rights issue.
The EU parliament was expected to balk on normalizing relations with Cuba.
However, pressure from Spain, Italy and France reportedly moved the EU to open
talks, although much show was given to exiled Cuban “dissidents,”
even awarding one an EU prize.
The proposed EU talks — “the soft-cop strategy” — and
the U.S. blockade are both aimed at overturning Cuba’s sovereignty,
independence from the U.S., and socialist system. However, the Cuban
people’s willingness to contribute and sacrifice for every Cuban’s
right to free, quality education and health care and to develop their fullest
potential, cannot be so easily defeated. History shows that.
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email:
[email protected]
Subscribe
[email protected]
Support independent news
DONATE