‘it’s about solidarity’
Temple nurses win strike
By
Betsey Piette
Philadelphia
Published May 7, 2010 7:29 PM
Chanting, “Hey, hey, ho, ho, it’s back to work we go!” nurses
and allied professional staff at Temple University Hospital returned to their
jobs on April 30 after a successful strike that lasted more than four weeks.
The nurses’ victory strikes a blow for organized labor in the
Philadelphia area.
The jubilant workers were sent off by a small but enthusiastic rally of
supporters and family members outside the hospital on North Broad Street in
Philadelphia for the start of the 7 p.m. shift. To bolster their victory, the
members of the Pennsylvania Staff Nurses and Allied Professionals (PASNAP) had
the opportunity to jeer at scab workers who were leaving the hospital on luxury
charter buses for the very last time. TUH had hired the scabs in an attempt to
defeat the union.
Temple management had tried to use the economic crisis as a battering ram to
force workers to take a concession-laden contract. The workers’
solidarity and their determination to stand up to the hospital’s blatant
effort to break their union finally forced management to greatly improve what
they had called their “last, best offer,” put on the table in
September.
Another key factor contributing to the victory was the growing support from
other unions and community organizations made evident in a major rally outside
the hospital on April 21.
After weeks when management refused to bend, progress in negotiations started a
few days after this rally. The result was a contract with most of the wage and
benefit provisions sought by the union.
The final agreement also eliminated anti-union provisions sought by management.
These included a “gag” clause that prevented nurses from speaking
of problems in delivering care, an attempt to eliminate agency shop, and a
proposal for separate contract term lengths for the nurses and the professional
staff.
More than 50 workers, students and community activists, striking Temple workers
and their family members attended an April 29 benefit in West Philadelphia to
support the strike. Jobs with Justice, the Philadelphia International Action
Center, the Bail Out the People Movement, the A-Space and Health Care NOW
sponsored the action. This benefit, earlier aimed at collecting funds and
supplies of diapers, canned goods, paper products and other items needed by
strikers and their families, also ended up being a victory celebration.
Some 97 percent of the members approved the new contract, which also partially
restored a tuition reimbursement benefit for workers’ dependents that
management had eliminated from the existing contract in March 2009. This was
the final sticking point on the last day of intense negotiations.
The strike of more than 1,500 workers began on March 31. During the strike, TUH
management paid an estimated $5 million a week to a notorious strikebreaking
company, Health Source Global Staffing, to secure replacement workers. These
scabs’ salaries averaged $5,500 a week, plus transportation, housing,
meals and security.
PASNAP has pointed out that what management spent in just two weeks of the
strike would have covered all the additional costs of the four-year contract
sought by the union.
Temple may owe unemployment benefits
Temple’s headache may not be over. Shortly after a contract was ratified
on April 29, PASNAP executive director Bill Cruice announced that TUH
“could be on the hook for a lot of money.” A wrinkle in
Pennsylvania labor law might lead to a decision that the 28-day strike was a
lockout by management. “It could amount to $1.5 million,” Cruice
estimated.
When Temple University Hospital eliminated the tuition reimbursement benefit in
2009, PASNAP filed unfair labor practice charges with the Pennsylvania Labor
Relations Board. PASNAP charged that TUH had to negotiate that kind of change
since it was a benefit from an existing contract.
Although the union’s contract came to an end in September, its members
continued to work. In January the Labor Relations Board ruled against the
hospital, ordering them to pay refunds to eligible workers. Temple responded by
appealing to the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, asking for a stay with the
Labor Relations Board. The court denied Temple’s request on March 16.
On March 26, after giving the hospital a strike notice one week earlier, Cruice
informed management that the union would continue to work under the terms of
their old contract as long it included the tuition benefit. Despite the labor
board ruling, Temple management refused this request, an act the union claims
constitutes a lockout under state law.
Up to the end of negotiations Temple’s management wanted the union to
drop its opposition to the hospital’s appeal of the labor board’s
ruling on the tuition reimbursement and agree not to seek back payment for
workers, but PASNAP refused.
In the end TUH had to agree to set up a $550,000 account to fund back payments.
In addition, it appears that PASNAP’s resilience led to hospital
management announcing a new tuition benefit for the rest of the
hospital’s 5,000-person staff.
Even as jubilant workers gathered to return to work on April 30, Temple
University Hospital’s management tried to get in one last jab by issuing
an edict that workers could not wear union buttons or t-shirts with the PASNAP
logo once they entered the building. Union president Maureen May counseled
members to keep their buttons on.
“Wear them and if asked to take them off, ask if refusal to do so could
result in disciplinary action,” May said. “If they say yes, take
them off, but notify the union and we will file an unfair labor practice.
“It’s not about a pin,” May told her members,
“It’s about union solidarity and we will win!”
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email:
[email protected]
Subscribe
[email protected]
Support independent news
DONATE