‘Recovery’ falters
Mass unemployment remains; capitalism at an impasse
By
Fred Goldstein
Published Jun 10, 2010 11:50 AM
The sound of the stock market crashing on June 4, when the Dow Jones Industrial
Average lost 324 points in one day, was the sound of Wall Street catching up to
economic developments.
The realization is dawning on the financial gamblers and speculators that their
hopes for a capitalist recovery are slipping away. The trillions of dollars in
bailout funds and stimulus funds have been unable to pull the capitalist
economy up enough to start a genuine recovery.
The market plunged over the release of the official government jobs numbers for
May. The speculators had had their hopes raised by rumors that May would see a
big jump in job creation in the capitalist economy — that is, in
business-created jobs. But the government report showed that of the 431,000 new
jobs created, 411,000 were from the government hiring people temporarily to
work for eight weeks on the 2010 Census.
Private businesses hired a net total of only 20,000 workers in May. With 30
million workers unemployed and underemployed, this means that the capitalist
economy basically stood still from the point of view of job creation.
It should be added that even with the few private jobs that were added, the
disparity in employment between Black, Latino/a and white workers is actually
getting worse. And the crisis of youth unemployment is still deepening.
Wall Street’s worry: profit creation
It hardly needs to be emphasized that Wall Street’s woes over the lack of
job creation have nothing to do with concern for the workers. Even though these
financial sharks live on speculative profits made from buying and selling
financial instruments of one type or another, they know full well that the
ultimate source of real profit is the exploitation of labor. The labor of the
workers creates all the wealth that the corporations pay out in dividends and
that the speculators gamble with.
To them, a failure of job creation is, in essence, a failure of profit
creation. That is what worries them first and foremost. Of course, they are
worried that expanding long-term mass unemployment could in the long run lead
to social uprisings. But in the short run, the market went down on the
realization that capitalist exploitation was slowing.
Even more telling about the overall crisis conditions battering the workers
right now are the government statistics on the state of the recovery. What the
capitalist pundits do not want to talk about is that the weak recovery had
already showed signs of decline and instability before these jobs numbers came
out.
Capitalist recovery faltered last quarter
The government’s Bureau of Economic Analysis compiles the numbers that
are used as the official gauge of economic growth or decline. According to
them, the overall decline of production that started in December 2007 ended in
the third quarter of 2009, and the ensuing capitalist recovery has continued
into the first quarter of 2010.
The bourgeoisie wants to emphasize that the recovery has continued for three
quarters in a row. What they don’t want to discuss is that in this last
quarter, that is, the third quarter of the recovery, there was a precipitous
decline in the rate of growth of economic activity compared to the previous
quarter.
The numbers, according to the BEA, are as follows: third quarter 2009, 2.2
percent growth; fourth quarter 2009, 5.5 percent growth; first quarter 2010,
2.3 percent growth — and this is now being revised down to 2.1
percent.
This is an unorthodox recovery, stimulated by capitalist government spending,
which amounts to the printing of money. But even in this early stage of the
recovery, it is already showing signs of weakness and instability. If the
enormous already-existing problems of unemployment and budget cutbacks were not
enough to set off alarm bells in the heads of leaders of the working class,
these latest economic numbers should. These developments do not in any way
correspond to a normal capitalist recovery.
Engels on normal capitalist recovery
In a normal capitalist recovery, growth in production and output feeds upon
itself to produce a continuous expansion.
Frederick Engels, Karl Marx’s closest collaborator, gave the classic
description of the capitalist boom-and-bust cycle in his work “Socialism,
Utopian and Scientific,” published in 1880.
“As a matter of fact, since 1825, when the first general crisis broke
out, the whole industrial and commercial world ... [is] thrown out of joint
once every 10 years. Commerce is at a standstill, the markets are glutted,
products accumulate, as multitudinous as they are unsalable, hard cash
disappears, credit vanishes, factories are closed, the mass of the workers are
in want of the means of subsistence, because they have produced too much of the
means of subsistence; bankruptcy follows upon bankruptcy. ... The stagnation
lasts for years; productive forces and products are wasted and destroyed
wholesale, until the accumulated mass of commodities finally filters off ...
until production and exchange gradually begin to move again. Little by little
the pace quickens. It becomes a trot. The industrial trot breaks into a canter,
the canter in turn grows into the headlong gallop of a perfect steeplechase of
industry, commercial credit, and speculation which finally, after breakneck
leaps, ends up where it began — in the ditch of crisis. And over and over
again.”
It is the repetition of this boom-and-bust business cycle that in the past has
driven capitalist production forward to achieve higher and higher levels over
time. On the ruins of each crisis, the bourgeoisie built up bigger means of
production. Giant firms, strong firms swallowed up smaller and weaker ones.
Capital became more and more centralized and concentrated. Vast sums were
invested in advancing technology in order to intensify exploitation and expand
into larger markets.
This is how the capitalist recovery fed its own growth. It expanded investment,
pulling workers into the work force to replace the destroyed or obsolete means
of production. The older factories, machines and so on were obsolete not in the
sense that they were no longer useful but in the sense that their use in
production no longer yielded the higher rates of profit attainable with newer
technology.
In the past, each crisis contained within it the seeds of a recovery. But today
there is no sign of what Engels described: a slow-paced beginning breaking into
a trot, then a canter and a full-scale gallop. The economy has not even gotten
past a crawl before it is beginning to slow down already. This is because the
recovery is not based on the normal capitalist process of expansion but upon
the intervention of the capitalist state.
State financing can’t save capitalism
Thus, it is clear that the bailouts and stimulus spending cannot fuel a
self-sustaining capitalist recovery — even the $10.5 trillion spent in
the U.S. and the several trillion in Europe and Japan. The trillion-dollar
bailout planned for southern Europe, even if the warring capitalist bandit
states can actually carry out such a collective action, will not overcome the
crisis of European capitalism, which cannot be separated from the crisis of
U.S. or Japanese capitalism. This is a crisis of world capitalism.
On the one hand, world capitalism has been dependent in the latest crisis on
the capitalist governments to keep it from collapsing. On the other hand, even
massive capitalist state financing cannot create a capitalist recovery.
Moreover, the trend is going in the opposite direction. In the United States,
for example, tens of thousands of jobs at all levels of government have already
been eliminated due to the budget crisis, which is a product of the overall
capitalist crisis. And this is just the beginning. Unless there is a concerted
struggle by the workers, the huge budget-cutting plans that are now in the
works, especially on the state and local level, will greatly increase
unemployment, more than offsetting any state intervention to create jobs.
All this confirms the Marxist analysis of the present crisis showing that
capitalism has reached an impasse. Historic overproduction, based upon three
decades of advancing technology, shedding labor and lowering wages around the
world, has created a capitalist future of stagnation, mass unemployment and
slow growth at best. The inevitable collapse of the system is now on the
historical agenda once again.
The repetitive paroxysms of crises within the financial system are a reflection
of capitalism having reached a qualitative turning point — the point at
which it cannot start itself up again by economic means alone.
Its decades of expanding productivity have created a productive system that has
outgrown the world markets it created. In a word, capitalism has outgrown the
planet and must be destroyed and replaced by socialism if the people of the
planet are to survive. Any temporary stabilization should not obscure this
historical fact.
The writer is author of the book “Low-Wage Capitalism,” a
Marxist analysis of globalization and its effects on the U.S. working class. He
has also written numerous articles and spoken on the present economic crisis.
For further information visit www.lowwagecapitalism.com.
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email:
[email protected]
Subscribe
[email protected]
Support independent news
DONATE