Polanski, rape & justice
By
Kathy Durkin
Published Oct 8, 2009 10:04 PM
The renowned film director Roman Polanski is being held in a Swiss jail,
awaiting possible extradition to the United States. He was arrested on a
31-year-old warrant while traveling to the Zurich Film Festival to receive an
award. He faces charges for sexually assaulting a child in 1977 in Los
Angeles.
While the director has garnered support among some celebrities in Europe and
Hollywood, women’s rights activists and many in the progressive movement
are appalled. They assert that to let Polanski off the hook trivializes child
sexual abuse, sends the message that rape is OK, and maintains that those who
are rich, famous and talented need not be held accountable for their
actions.
It is clear from the grand jury testimony given by Samantha Geimer in
1977 that when she was 13-years-old, Polanski drugged and raped her. She
protested and said “no” repeatedly throughout the ordeal, but he
ignored her. She feared him and insisted on going home.
Although Polanski was indicted on several molestation charges, he pleaded
guilty only to having “unlawful sex with a minor” under a plea
bargain. A year later, prior to sentencing, when the judge inferred that he
might jail Polanski, the director fled to Europe. There, he built a
multi-million-dollar career and lived the “good life.” Hollywood
studios continued to finance his films.
Kenneth F. Face, Polanski’s probation officer in 1977, recommended
probation without jail time. The New York Times said that officials then
treated Polanski’s behavior as “bad judgment” and not a
“vicious assault,” the “usual” way that sexual attacks
by Hollywood celebrities were viewed. (Oct. 2)
Face blamed Geimer and her mother for Polanski’s behavior. Face excused
Polanski, citing his European background and past tragedies, which were held up
by his defenders then and are being repeated now.
However, it was Polanski’s actions stemming from his sense of
entitlement, power and privilege that were to blame—along with male
superiority. That this terrible act occurred in a sexist culture, in which
disrespect and devaluation of women and girls are reinforced every day, is not
unexpected.
Another double standard
Polanski’s celebrity friends are calling his arrest
“horrifying.” They say the director should be absolved of blame and
allowed to put this “messy business” behind him, as if he
didn’t pay traffic fines. They infer that being a “great
artist” exempts him from acting with basic human decency.
More than 100 Hollywood notables have signed petitions calling for
Polanski’s release. Movie producer Harvey Weinstein, characterizing
Polanski’s assault as a “so-called crime,” said the director
“has served his time.” Others say he has “suffered
enough” and “atoned for the sins of his young years”—he
was 43!
What about Samantha Geimer’s suffering and her decades of coping with the
memory of the abuse? What about the media now subjecting her and her family to
sensational coverage of every detail of the assault? No wonder she wants the
case dismissed.
Why aren’t celebrities circulating a petition supporting Geimer and all
survivors of sexual abuse and condemning Polanski and his defenders? In fact,
why not call for a women’s tribunal—made up of survivors of sexual
assault—to decide his fate?
If Polanski were a poor or unknown artist, would these celebrities call for his
release? Could his lawyer have even made a plea bargain? Would he have been
able to travel freely for decades, build a successful career, and enjoy a life
of privilege? Would he be called a “martyr” to art whose
“art” outweighs his deeds?
Two systems of ‘justice’
There are two systems of justice in this country. One is for the wealthy,
famous, powerful and privileged, especially if they are white and male. The
other is for working and poor people, members of oppressed communities and
women. Hundreds of thousands of poor people are in jails nationwide for lesser
offenses.
World-famous performers and athletes who are African American and members of
other oppressed communities are prosecuted, persecuted, scrutinized and
demonized for minor offenses, even driving infractions, or for no reason at
all.
Prosecutors said actor Wesley Snipes should be “made an example of
because of his fame” for failing to file income tax returns. New York
City Mayor Michael Bloomberg called for prosecution of Plaxico Burress to the
“fullest extent of the law.” The football champion is serving a
two-year prison sentence for accidentally shooting himself at a club.
Olympic-winning athlete Marion Jones was jailed for six months because she
didn’t “tell the truth” to federal investigators about her
alleged steroid use.
Where is the “justice” when Jones—the mother of two young
children, who pleaded for leniency and who did nothing to harm another
person—was cruelly jailed and demonized in the press, when Polanski, who
preyed upon a child, whose probation officer recommended no jail time, was then
allowed to evade arrest for 31 years and become a “cause
célèbre”?
Where were the celebrity petitions calling for Jones’ release?
Women’s inequality and oppression, along with national, LGBT and economic
oppressions, are intrinsic to capitalism. During this economic crisis, as women
face workplace discrimination, right-wing attacks on their basic rights in
courts and legislatures, and defunding of vital programs, including for
facilities for sexual abuse and domestic violence survivors, they are also
being maligned in the reactionary media.
It is only through the struggles of women—Black, Latina, Asian, Native,
Arab and white—and their fightback organizations that progress is made
and women’s rights gained, while acceptance of sexist ideology and
behavior are pushed back.
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email:
[email protected]
Subscribe
[email protected]
Support independent news
DONATE