U.S. biggest culprit of global warming
By
LeiLani Dowell
New York
Published Jan 15, 2007 11:18 AM
The spring-like condition of the weather in the first week of January in New
York had everyone talking. Flowers were blooming months early. It was the first
snowless winter since 1877 (Los Angeles Times, Jan. 6), and many people were
worrying about one thing: global warming.
While weathercasters reported that the recent oddities were due not to global
warming but to El Niño—temperature fluctuations in surface waters of
the tropical Eastern Pacific Ocean—it’s not just New York that has
been showing the symptoms. The Australian Bureau of Meteorology reported that
2006 saw the warmest spring there on record. Neil Plummer, senior climatologist
of the bureau, said, “Most scientists agree this is part of an enhanced
greenhouse gas effect. Of Australia’s 20 hottest years [on record], 15
have occurred since 1980.” (Financial Times, Jan. 3)
Ted Scambos, a glaciologist with the National Snow and Ice Data Center in
Boulder, Colo., reports, “From Europe, the East Coast, north to the Artic
and across to Siberia, there’s a very large swath of the Northern
Hemisphere for the months of September, October and November that [were]
exceedingly warm.” (Washington Post, Jan. 7)
After petitions and a lawsuit from environmental groups, the Bush
administration has recently proposed to put the polar bear on the threatened
species list under the Endangered Species Act. In 2005, scientists found
evidence that polar bears were drowning because they had to swim longer
distances to find food, due to the melting of the Arctic ice shelf. (Sunday
Times of Britain, Dec. 18, 2005)
On Dec. 29, the Guardian UK reported that a huge ice island had suddenly broken
off from an ice shelf in the Canadian Artic, alarming scientists who had
assumed that global warming changes would occur much more gradually.
United States corporations guilty
According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the United States is
the largest single emitter of carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels,
a leading cause in global warming. (www.eia.doe.gov) Some state, city and local
governments have passed legislation to cut emissions, as in California, New
York, Washington, D.C., and Arlington, Va.
Yet the federal government has washed its hands of the issue—consistently
refusing to ratify the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change, which was originally negotiated in 1997.
Signatory countries of the non-binding protocol commit to reduce their
emissions of carbon dioxide and five other greenhouse gases, or provide
economic incentives for reduction.
Placing the blame directly on the United States, the Inuit Circumpolar
Conference filed a complaint with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
stating the United States’ refusal to limit its emissions has violated
the rights of the Artic Inuit people to use their traditional lands, their
rights to health and life, and to their livelihood. While the commission
rejected the petition in December, Inuit leaders vow to continue the struggle
to expose these violations. (Nunatsiaq News, Dec. 17)
Not only are capitalist corporations—the government’s real
bosses—unwilling to do anything to stop what is already becoming a global
crisis; some of them are still actively trying to mislead the public to think
that global warming doesn’t exist.
A Jan. 3 press release from the Union of Concerned Scientists announced their
new report on “how ExxonMobil has adopted the tobacco industry’s
disinformation tactics, as well as some of the same organizations and
personnel, to cloud the scientific understanding of climate change and delay
action on the issue. According to the report, Exxon Mobil has funneled nearly
$16 million between 1998 and 2005 to a network of 43 advocacy organizations
that seek to confuse the public on global warming science.” The report is
available at www.ucsusa.org.
The release explains that ExxonMobil has:
• raised doubts about even the most indisputable scientific evidence;
• funded an array of front organizations to create the appearance of a broad
platform for a tight-knit group of vocal climate change contrarians who
misrepresent peer-reviewed scientific findings;
• attempted to portray its opposition to action as a positive quest for
“sound science” rather than business self-interest;
• used its access to the Bush administration to block federal policies and shape
government communications on global warming.
If ExxonMobil were a country, it would be the sixth-largest expender of global
warming emissions. (AlterNet, Jan. 8)
Other corporations attempt to cover up their horrible track records on the
environment by making only the paltriest efforts to help. For example, a New
York Times editorial lauds Wal-Mart for pushing to sell 100 million compact
fluorescent light bulbs—which use less energy than regular light
bulbs—a year. More than half the electricity in the U.S. comes from
coal-burning plants, the editorial reports.
Yet from Connecticut to Washington to Pennsylvania, complaints have been filed
against Wal-Mart stores for violations of water quality standards, as well as
pesticide and fertilizer pollution. In Dallas, the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency was willing to waive some water quality standards just for
Wal-Mart stores.
While products like compact fluorescent light bulbs can provide some reprieve
to the problem of global warming emissions, the largest contributors to the
problem are not individuals, but these corporations. Under capitalism, they are
allowed to run rampant, trampling over any rights of workers, including
environmental protection, unless a struggle forces them back.
In addition, when disasters occur as a result of these policies—like
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita—the U.S. government is not only ill-equipped
but unwilling to deal with the consequences to the people. Recently, National
Hurricane Center Director Max Mayfield stepped down from his 34-year position,
saying that the United States lacked the political will to commit to the kind
of hurricane preparedness that will be needed in the current highly active
hurricane cycle. (Los Angeles Times, Jan. 3)
The struggle to save the planet from global warming is therefore yet another
reason why capitalism must be replaced with a system that places
people—and the environment that sustains them—over profits.
E-mail: [email protected]
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email:
[email protected]
Subscribe
[email protected]
Support independent news
DONATE