An invitation or an ambush?
Iranian president dukes it out at Columbia
By
Deirdre Griswold
New York
Published Sep 27, 2007 12:16 AM
If the appearance of Iran’s president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, at Columbia
University in New York on Sept. 24 proved anything, it is that the high-priced
educational institutions of the United States are an integral part of the
political establishment that directs the imperialist foreign policy of this
country.
The event was intended to be a trap, a photo op to rev up anti-Iran propaganda
to a white heat and give President George W. Bush a cover for the
Pentagon’s plans to attack that oil-rich country.
The tabloids in New York tried to crank up a lynch-mob spirit. “The evil
has landed,” was the huge front-page headline of the Daily News, along
with a photo that caught Ahmadinejad with his eyes half closed.
Columbia’s president, Lee Bollinger, had been harshly attacked,
especially by supporters of Israel, for extending an invitation to the Iranian
president. But they loved it when he spent 14 minutes insulting Ahmadinejad in
what was supposed to be an introduction to this guest speaker. In the guise of
giving a welcoming speech, Bollinger went completely over the line, calling the
elected Iranian president a “petty, cruel dictator” who was either
“brazenly provocative or astonishingly uneducated.”
Outside, what amounted to an anti-Iran rally was taking place on the Columbia
campus, to the delight of all the corporate news media.
Did it work? Only if you go by what the media said about the meeting. And that,
of course, is all that most people in the United States get to hear about
it.
But transcripts and the video that have made it onto the Internet show that
Ahmadinejad was sharp, calm but combative, and restored some measure of reality
to the event when he finally got a chance to talk. He also got support from
some of the students.
After being pilloried by the head of the university—who, by the way, is
also a member of the Federal Reserve Board of New York, a sign of his standing
among the financial elite—Ahmadinejad right away replied, to applause,
that in Iran a guest would never be treated that way: “We actually
respect our students and the professors by allowing them to make their own
judgment, and we don’t think it’s necessary before the speech is
even given to come in with a series of claims and to attempt in a so-called
manner to provide vaccination of some sort to our students and our
faculty.”
He went on to reply to the questions raised—something very few heads of
state, especially those from the imperialist powers, ever do. Ahmadinejad and
Iran have been accused of denying the Holocaust happened and of trying to build
nuclear weapons. The imperialist powers, led by the United States but including
Britain and now France, are actually threatening war against Iran, supposedly
because of its nuclear program. A huge armada of U.S. warships sits off its
coast.
Asked his position on the Holocaust, Ahmadinejad did not deny it happened, but
questioned what had happened to the Middle East since then in its name.
“It happened in Europe. The Palestinian people had no role to play in it.
... Why is it that the Palestinians must pay the price, innocent
Palestinians?” he asked. “For 5 million refugees to remain
displaced or refugees abroad for 60 years—is this not a crime? Is asking
about these things a crime by itself?”
Asked if he wanted to see Israel destroyed, the implication being that Iran was
poised for a war against the Zionist settler state, Ahmadinejad referred to the
territory as Palestine, and replied, “Let the people of Palestine freely
choose what they want for their future.”
The Israeli regime has expelled millions of Palestinians and won’t let
them return to their homeland, where they would become the majority. If
democracy really existed there for all the people, including the Palestinians
now forced into dismal refugee camps, a secular state of Arabs and Jews could
have replaced the theocratic state of Israel a long time ago.
On Iran’s nuclear development, Ahmadinejad stressed that its purpose was
to provide peaceful power, that his country has been a member of the
International Atomic Energy Agency for over 33 years, and that member states
have the right to peaceful nuclear fuel technology. But he also pointed out the
extreme hypocrisy of Washington on this issue. “If you have created the
fifth generation of atomic bombs,” he said, “and are testing them
already, what position are you in to question the peaceful purpose of other
people who want nuclear power?”
The next morning, in his speech to the UN General Assembly, Ahmadinejad laced
into “certain powers” that pretend to be exclusive advocates of
human rights while “Setting up secret prisons, abducting persons, trials
and secret punishments without any regard to due process, extensive tapping of
telephone conversations, intercepting private mail, and frequent summons to
police and security centers have become commonplace and prevalent.”
Everyone understood who he was talking about; the U.S. and Israeli delegates
boycotted the speech.
It wasn’t long ago that Pentagon saber-rattling was so feared that few of
the once-colonized countries of the world seeking sovereignty and peaceful
development dared challenge U.S. imperialism in public. Like the resistance in
Iraq and the emergence of nationalist regimes in Latin America, the Iranian
leader’s visit to the U.S. underscored that the times they are
a-changing.
And they’re changing inside the U.S., too. The liberal news Web site
commondreams.org on Sept. 25 ran a short piece on Ahmadinejad’s visit by
Ru Freeman that excoriated Bollinger for acting “appallingly and
disgracefully,” and concluded that “the president of Iran possesses
a grace that neither his host nor the hecklers at Columbia University nor the
press in this country nor, I might as well state the obvious, the president of
this country can claim.”
By that evening, 116 e-mails had been posted commenting on Freeman’s
article—and they overwhelmingly criticized Bollinger’s treatment of
the Iranian president and the arrogance of U.S. authorities in general. One
writer summed it up: “How come Bollinger never managed the courage to
direct those words towards our own petty, cruel dictator?”
ν
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email:
[email protected]
Subscribe
[email protected]
Support independent news
DONATE