Racism, resistance and the death penalty
By
Gloria Rubac
Houston
Published May 10, 2007 12:55 AM
Hours before he was executed on March 7, Joseph Nichols told his mother what
had happened to him as the prison prepared to move him from death-row housing
in Livingston, Texas, to the death house in Huntsville.
“They cut off all my clothes and stripped me naked. I finally got a pair
of boxers but my feet were shackled together, my hand were chained and then
another chain bound my feet, went up over my shoulders and bound my hands. This
is how our people were brought here from the motherland, naked and chained, and
this is how I will leave.”
Nichols was executed despite front-page articles in the Houston Chronicle and
opinion pieces explaining his innocence. On the gurney, with the IV loaded with
poison, he blasted the prison personnel who had ordered him to shave or be
disciplined the evening before his execution.
More and more in Texas, prisoners are not going willingly to their executions,
but are fighting until the end. They are also actively protesting the
conditions of severe isolation and torture. The DRIVE Movement, an activist
organization on Texas death row, has held several hunger strikes in the last
year, as have several individuals.
Roy Pippin, who had steadfastly maintained his innocence, was executed on March
29, after his month-long hunger strike exposing the horrific conditions on
Texas death row won significant media attention.
In his last statement while on the gurney, Pippin said: “I charge the
people of the jury, the trial judge, the prosecutor that cheated to get this
conviction. I charge each and every one of you with the murder of an innocent
man. All the way to the CCA, Federal Court, 5th Circuit and Supreme Court. You
will answer to your Maker when God has found out that you executed an innocent
man. May God have mercy on you. ... Go ahead, Warden, murder me. Jesus, take me
home.”
Last summer, Michael Johnson, another Texas prisoner who had always maintained
his innocence, slashed his own throat rather than let the state kill him.
Before he bled to death, he wrote on the wall of his cell in his own blood,
“I did not kill that man.”
In November 2006, after Willie Shannon was executed, he was laid in his casket
dressed as a Black Panther, a reflection of his politics. He was a member of
Panthers United for Revolutionary Education—PURE—a Texas death row
organization.
Executions in the United States have dropped to the lowest levels in 10 years.
The number of death sentences and the population of death row are also
decreasing. For the first time ever, the Gallup Poll has reported that more
people favor life in prison without parole over the death penalty.
During the 1990s there were about 300 death sentences given each year. Now the
number is around 125. Even in Texas, death sentences are down 65 percent from
10 years ago.
Because of the issue of innocence, juries are less willing to condemn someone
to die. Over a dozen states have halted executions due to innocence and also
the rising evidence that the method of lethal injection kills prisoners while
they are still conscious. The New Jersey legislature had a hearing scheduled
for early May that could end lead to that state ending the death penalty.
In recent years, a number of major newspapers have changed their position on
the death penalty and are now calling for its abolition. In the past month,
both the Chicago Tribune and the Dallas Morning News reversed their
longstanding support for capital punishment. And the Sentinel of Pennsylvania
simply called the death penalty “useless.”
Amnesty International reported that executions worldwide fell by more than 25
percent last year, down from 2,148 in 2005 to 1,591 in 2006. Of all known
executions that took place in 2006, 91 percent were carried out in six
countries: China, Iran, Pakistan, Iraq, Sudan and the United States.
Over half the world’s countries have abolished the death penalty in law
or in practice.
In the United States, the death penalty is used mainly in the former
slave-holding states of the old Confederacy. Between 85 percent and 90 percent
of all U.S. executions take place in the South. This is no accident. Racism
plays such a huge role in the death penalty because it is a direct outgrowth of
the legacy of slavery and lynchings.
During the last 125 years there have been thousands of illegal, extra-judicial
lynchings in the United States, primarily in the South, primarily done by
whites against Blacks. The majority took place in the late 1800s and the first
half of the 1900s.
Today, in the 21st century, it is the era of legal lynchings.
They are still carried out mainly by whites and used mainly against people of
color. Ninety-eight percent of all district attorneys in the United States are
white, and only 1 percent is Black. It is these district attorneys who decide
whether a defendant will face the death penalty.
States that sentence the most people to death also are the states that had the
most illegal lynchings in the past, according to a study released in 2002 by
sociologists at Ohio State University.
Historically unjust
The one factor that most determines whether a defendant will be sentenced to
death is the race of the person killed. Even though Black and white people are
murdered in nearly equal numbers, 80 percent of people executed since the death
penalty was reinstated in 1976 had cases involving white victims.
Only 14 white people have ever been executed for the murder of a Black person,
while 215 Black people have been executed for killing whites.
Conversely, white women represent only 0.8 percent of murder victims—yet
35 percent of those executed since 1976 were sentenced to die for killing a
white woman.
The over-all picture of capital punishment shows nationality involved at every
turn. If a white person is murdered, whether the defendants are Black or white,
they are at least five times more likely to be given the death penalty than if
a Black person is murdered.
African Americans are the least likely to serve on capital juries but the most
likely to be condemned to die.
In Texas, racism in the criminal justice system was openly practiced until
recently. Defense attorneys in Dallas remember that until the mid-1980s
so-called Black-on-Black murders were known around the courthouse as
“misdemeanor murder.” Attorney Fred Tinsley reported in 2000,
“At one point, with a Black-on-Black murder, you could get it dismissed
if the defendant would just pay funeral expenses.”
The U.S. Supreme Court twice found the method of jury selection in Dallas
unconstitutional. In response, Dallas District Attorney Henry Wade developed a
system of training prosecutors to excuse people of color, women, Jews and those
physically disabled.
Wade reprimanded a prosecutor in the late 1950s for allowing a Black woman on a
jury, telling him, “If you ever put another n——-r on a jury,
you’re fired.”
An African American, Thomas Miller-El, was sentenced to death in Dallas in
1986. In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that he be retried because all
African Americans except for one were excluded from his jury. He is now at the
Dallas County Jail awaiting a new trial.
In Philadelphia, where political prisoner Mumia Abu-Jamal was sentenced to
death, the odds of receiving a death sentence are 38 percent higher in cases in
which the defendant is Black. In fact, in Pennsylvania, over 70 percent of
those on death row are African American; this is the highest proportion in the
country.
The United States is a little over 225 years old. It was built on land stolen
from the Indigenous peoples and Mexico, and on the backs of African slave
labor. It became highly industrialized during the last hundred years and today
is the leading imperialist power because it exploits its large working class, a
growing proportion of whom are African American, Latin@, Arab, Asian and Native
American.
National oppression and racism is so tightly woven into the fabric of life in
this country that it colors all aspects of life from birth to death, including
death at the hands of the state.
“The movement to abolish the death penalty is growing and learning that
if executions are to end, we must be a movement of all peoples, particularly
those of us who make up the majority on death row. No change has ever come
willingly. We must fight for it. But with unity and struggle we will see the
end of this crime called capital punishment,” said Njeri Shakur, a leader
of the Texas Death Penalty Abolition Movement for over a decade.
The writer is a long-time organizer with the TDPAM.
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email:
[email protected]
Subscribe
[email protected]
Support independent news
DONATE