Cafeteria workers strike against poverty wages
By
Brenda Ryan
New York
Published Dec 20, 2007 12:57 AM
Every day since Nov. 12, a group of cafeteria workers have held an energetic
picket line outside the New York Life Insurance building in Manhattan.
Employees of Aramark, they are demanding a 70-cent per hour pay hike.
It’s a pittance for Aramark, a food services contractor that raked in
$11.6 billion in sales last year and paid its CEO $16.2 million.
Most of the workers have been employed by Aramark for 20 years and earn $10 to
$14 per hour, which comes out to less than $500 per week, said Floridalma
Mayen, an 18-year veteran of the company. “Everything goes up but our
wages,” she added.
Mayen stood outside the building on a frigid Monday afternoon as the strike
went into its fifth week. In addition to the 50 workers at the New York Life
building, 36 Aramark employees at 55 Water St. are also on strike. The workers,
members of UNITE HERE Local 100, have been without a contract for the past
year.
Aramark is offering them only a 50-cent per hour increase and refusing to make
the increase retroactive. Mayen said that in the last three years they’ve
had a mere 55-cent per hour raise.
The cafeteria workers are not alone in the struggle. “We have a lot of
support from the customers,” Mayen said. New York Life employees have
boycotted the cafeteria and refused to renew enrollment in a pretax dining plan
until the strike is over. And on Dec. 11 civil rights leader Jesse Jackson
showed up to offer his support. Jackson, who had a previously planned meeting
with the chairman of New York Life, joined the workers afterwards and told them
he had spoken on their behalf to Aramark and the head of New York Life.
Aramark employees at other sites are also prepared to battle for better wages
as their collective bargaining agreements with the company expire at cafeterias
around the city. UNITE HERE said Aramark food service workers at the Fashion
Institute of Technology, Bank of New York and Citigroup have already voted to
authorize a strike at their locations. The union said that if Aramark does not
raise their living standards, workers at cafeterias at CBS, Goldman Sachs, JP
Morgan Chase and the United Nations could join the strike as their contracts
expire.
The food service giant has a long record of poverty wages and poor working
conditions. Earlier this year, the U.S. Department of Labor found that Aramark
failed to pay proper wages and benefits to some food service employees at Los
Alamos National Laboratory. New Mexico Business Weekly reported in an April 12
article that following the investigation, Aramark paid $153,440 in back wages
and fringe benefits to 72 employees. In 2004, the Baltimore Wage Commission
found that Aramark, which operated food services at the Baltimore Convention
Center, violated the city’s overtime laws for two years. The Baltimore
Sun reported that the company subsequently paid 283 workers $131,000 in back
pay.
UNITE HERE and the Service Employees International Union have compiled
information on Aramark’s mistreatment of workers at the Web site
factsonaramark.info.
Aramark employees, meanwhile, are fighting to bring more workers into the
union. Last month Aramark workers at PriceWaterhouseCooper on Madison Avenue
submitted a petition to their employers asking for a fair process to decide
whether to organize a union. Crains New York Business reported Dec. 11 that
seven of the 20 food service workers at Citigroup’s executive dining room
at 53rd Street and Lexington Avenue were suspended for two days after they
submitted a petition to Citigroup chairman Robert Rubin stating their desire to
unionize.
In a quarterly report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission June
29, Aramark said that approximately 37,000 employees in its U.S. operations are
represented by unions and covered by collective bargaining agreements. Noting
that unions are seeking to increase the representation of its workforce,
Aramark stated: “We have always respected our employees’ right to
unionize or not to unionize. However, the unionization of a significantly
greater portion of our workforce could increase our overall costs at the
affected locations and affect adversely our flexibility to run our business in
the most efficient manner to remain competitive or acquire new
business.”
Aramark workers in Manhattan and around the country won’t allow Aramark
to continue to grow its profits by paying them poverty wages.
“We’ll stay on strike until the company gives us retroactive pay
and 70 cents [more per hour],” Mayen said.
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email:
ww@workers.org
Subscribe
wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.net
Support independent news
DONATE