Defending right of self-defense
North Koreans resist U.S., Japan bullying
By
Dustin Langley
Published Jul 12, 2006 11:22 PM
In the week before the Democratic
People’s Republic of Korea tested seven missiles on July 4, Japanese Prime
Minister Junichiro Koizumi was in Washington to meet with President George W.
Bush. The media made much of the prime minister’s upcoming visit to
Graceland, Elvis’s Memphis mansion.
However, at a June 29 White
House press conference, the real purpose of the visit was made clear. Bush
warned North Korea that Japan “cannot afford to be held hostage to
rockets” and said it would be “unacceptable” for the North to
test a long-range missile. At the joint news conference, Koizumi said the two
leaders had agreed to “apply various pressures” on North Korea
should it proceed with a test launching.
Now, in the days following the
DPRK’s missile launch, Japan for the first time since its defeat in World
War II is taking the lead in a confrontation on the Korean peninsula. Its draft
resolution, submitted to the UN Security Council on July 7, calls the
DPRK’s missile tests a threat to international peace and mandates economic
sanctions against North Korea. The draft invokes Chapter 7 of the UN Charter,
which would make the sanctions mandatory and pave the way for military
action.
Prime Minister Koizumi, a close ally of the Bush administration,
has been taking a more aggressive stance towards Japan’s neighbors and has
been pushing to revise the Japanese Constitution, which currently prohibits
military action except for self-defense.
The hawkish head of Japan’s
defense agency, Fukushiro Nukaga, and Chief Cabinet Secretary Shinzo Abe, widely
viewed as Koizumi’s likely successor, argue that Japan should prepare for
“preemptive” strikes against the DPRK. Japan does not currently have
the capability to strike North Korea, but Abe has suggested that they work to
develop the necessary systems. The July 11 Washington Post says that experts
“believe Japan could develop the technology relatively quickly or perhaps
buy it from the United States.”
Koizumi’s willingness to take
a belligerent stand may come at an opportune time for Washington, which is
bogged down in the failed three-year campaign to conquer Iraq. Japan’s
threat of a first strike against North Korea allows Bush to cynically call for a
“diplomatic solution” while pushing for economic sanctions as part
of the agenda of “regime change.”
Reaction in South
Korea
However, Japan’s threats have provoked anger in South
Korea, where the government remains hostage to U.S. occupying troops but where
the memory of Japanese colonial rule is still strong. On July 10, presidential
spokesperson Jung Tae-ho said, “We can’t help but watch intensely as
Japan has exposed the nature of its aggressive policy.”
The South
Korean statement denounced Japan’s call to consider military action
against the DPRK, accusing the Koizumi administration of “arrogance and
outrageous rhetoric that further intensifies the crisis on the Korean Peninsula
with dangerous and provocative rhetoric such as ‘preemptive strike.’
In light of the painful historical records that Japan justified its invasion of
Korea in the past … we cannot but conclude that these grave and
threatening statements are to endanger peace in Northeast Asia. They reveal the
military nature of Japan, which warrants our intense vigilance.”
All of Korea suffered under a brutal Japanese occupation that lasted from
1910 to 1945.
South Korean President Roh Moo-Hyun said about the missile
tests, “There’s no reason to fuss over this from the break of dawn
like Japan, but every reason to do the opposite. There is nothing good in
heightening tensions on the Korean peninsula and worsening inter-Korean
relations. This will not help at all to settle the nuclear issue or the missile
issue. … The possible launch of a Daepodong missile had been widely
publicized in advance. It was aimed at nobody and did not lead to a state of
emergency in either our country or other countries.”
A top South
Korean government official told the Korea Herald, “Unfortunately—and
I believe our regional neighbors feel the same way—one of the worst side
effects of the North Korean missiles was that it has paved the road for Japan to
build its military.”
China opposes
sanctions
resolution
The U.S.-Japanese resolution has drawn opposition from the
People’s Republic of China, whose people also suffered under Japanese
occupation. On July 11, China’s Foreign Ministry issued a statement
calling the resolution an “overreaction,” saying, “If
approved, it will aggravate contradictions and increase tension. It will hurt
efforts to resume six-party talks as well as lead to the UN Security Council
splitting.” This was an allusion to the fact that, if pressed, China might
have to exercise its right, as a permanent member of the Security Council, to
veto the resolution.
Chinese President Hu Jintao met with the vice
president of the Presidium of the DPRK’s Supreme People’s Assembly
that same day. He said that China opposes any action that may increase tension
on the Korean peninsula.
Wang Guangya, China’s UN Ambas sador, told
Voice of America that China would categorically reject any resolution unless
three things were removed: “The determination that this is a threat to
international peace and security, because for China, we can’t accept
negative implications for regional peace and stability. Secondly, remove Chapter
Seven. Thirdly, there are no mandatory sanctions.”
Seeking to
negotiate a diplomatic settlement to the crisis, a Chinese delegation, including
Deputy Foreign Minister Wu Dawei, arrived in the North Korean capital Pyongyang,
also on July 11. The UN Security Council has been forced to postpone a vote on
the proposed sanctions against North Korea until the six-day visit is
over.
DPRK’s right to self-defense
Despite pressure and
threats from the U.S. and Japan, the DPRK remains defiant, calling the U.S. the
biggest threat to world peace. On the same day as the diplomatic moves mentioned
above, the Korean Central News Agency said, “In crying over ‘missile
threat,’ the U.S. seeks to conceal its sinister intention and, behind the
curtain, create a favorable climate for implementing its strategy of world
supremacy.”
It’s important to point out, amidst all the
corporate media hype, that North Korea’s missile tests did not break any
international law or violate any agreement. Even the New York Times, which is
quick to demonize the DPRK, had to admit in a July 5 editorial: “Since the
test poses no direct security threat, and violates no international treaty,
there is no justification for any military response, by the United States or
anyone else.”
These sorts of missile tests are not unusual. Many
countries test missiles and other weapon systems every day. In fact, on July 10,
India tested a new Agni-3 long-range missile, capable of hitting targets deep
within China. This test was followed by the launch of its INSAT-4C rocket. Bush
issued no condemnation of India’s launches.
The development of the
Taepodong-2 missile, or of any other weapon system, is completely within the
sovereign rights of the DPRK, particularly in light of its history of being
invaded by Japan and the U.S. and the hostility of the current Bush
administration. In 2002, Bush labeled North Korea as one third of his
“axis of evil,” along with Iran and Iraq. Now that everyone has seen
the murder, torture and rape that U.S. “regime change” has brought
to Iraq, it should be clear that the people of the DPRK are fully justified in
developing whatever weapons they need to defend themselves.
The July 5 Al
Jazeera quotes a “Western diplomat familiar with the Iranian and North
Korean programs” as saying, “If those countries didn’t have
much incentive before, they certainly did after the Axis of Evil
statement.”
The DPRK continues to defy the U.S. agenda, and the
people of North Korea deserve the support and solidarity of antiwar activists
everywhere.
Articles copyright 1995-2012 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email:
[email protected]
Subscribe
[email protected]
Support independent news
DONATE